As a genealogist, I often find myself sifting through old records, attempting to piece together the puzzle of my family history. Recently, I decided to revisit some of my unfinished cases in an effort to resolve and close them. One such case, labeled X00188, involves the mystery surrounding the death of my 4th great-grandfather, Henry Rothwell.
Henry Rothwell appeared in the 1871 census, but by the time the 1881 census rolled around, he was nowhere to be found. His wife was listed, but Henry was conspicuously absent. Naturally, I assumed that he had passed away sometime before 1881. However, finding the correct death record proved to be more challenging than I had anticipated.
The name Henry Rothwell is not particularly uncommon, and I struggled to locate a death record that matched both his age and the likely death location of Blackburn, Lancashire. After an exhaustive search, I finally stumbled upon a death record from Blackpool, Lancashire that seemed to fit the bill. Given that Blackpool was a popular vacation destination, it was entirely possible that Henry had been visiting the area at the time of his death. Intrigued, I decided to order the death certificate from the General Register Office (GRO) to see if it held any clues.
When the death certificate arrived, it revealed that Henry Rothwell had indeed died at a hotel in Blackpool. At first glance, everything seemed to fall into place. However, as I delved deeper into the records, I discovered that there was more than one Henry Rothwell in the area of Blackburn, and both were married to women named Alice. This revelation complicated matters significantly and forced me to re-examine my assumptions about Henry's family and what I know about them.
As I continue to investigate, I'm uncovering new mysteries that require further exploration. The tangled web of historical records and similar names has made it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Nevertheless, I remain determined to piece together the story of Henry Rothwell and his family.
Stay tuned for future blog posts as I dive deeper into this intriguing case and work to unravel the secrets of my ancestors.
Monday, March 3, 2025
Monday, February 24, 2025
Unearthing Jane Doritty's Hidden Past: A Genealogical Journey
As I have been researching the Doritty family of Niagara, one particular family member, Jane Doritty, had eluded my grasp for quite some time. Despite my best efforts, I had only managed to uncover that she was born around 1835 in Upper Canada, as indicated by the 1851 and 1861 census records. Her confirmation record from St. Mark’s Anglican Church further corroborated this approximate year of birth. However, beyond 1861, Jane seemed to vanish from the historical records.
I had nearly resigned myself to the possibility that Jane’s story might remain incomplete when, serendipitously, I stumbled upon the County Marriage Registers for Lincoln & Welland Counties, spanning the years 1858 to 1869. There, among the entries, I found a glimmer of hope: “Lowe John, 28, Port Huron MI, Canada, s/o John and Ann, married 27 July 1862 Jane Dority, 26, Niagara, Canada, d/o Thomas & Ann.” The details were a perfect match—Jane’s age, location, and her parents’ names aligned with what I already knew. This revelation opened a floodgate of information. Armed with the knowledge that she had married a man with the surname Lowe, I was able to delve deeper into her life.
As I continued my research, knowing that her married name was "Lowe", I unearthed records of her children and traced her presence in various census records. The final piece of the puzzle came when I discovered her listing on Find a Grave, which noted her date of death as 16 October 1903 in Detroit, Michigan.
Jane Doritty’s story had been hidden in the shadows of history, but through persistent research and a stroke of luck, I was able to bring her life back into the light. There is always more to discover, and as I continue to uncover the stories of my ancestors, I am reminded of the importance of perseverance and curiosity in the pursuit of genealogical research.
Stay tuned for more updates as I continue to unravel the intricate tapestry of my family's history. Each new finding is a step closer to understanding the lives of those who came before us.
I had nearly resigned myself to the possibility that Jane’s story might remain incomplete when, serendipitously, I stumbled upon the County Marriage Registers for Lincoln & Welland Counties, spanning the years 1858 to 1869. There, among the entries, I found a glimmer of hope: “Lowe John, 28, Port Huron MI, Canada, s/o John and Ann, married 27 July 1862 Jane Dority, 26, Niagara, Canada, d/o Thomas & Ann.” The details were a perfect match—Jane’s age, location, and her parents’ names aligned with what I already knew. This revelation opened a floodgate of information. Armed with the knowledge that she had married a man with the surname Lowe, I was able to delve deeper into her life.
As I continued my research, knowing that her married name was "Lowe", I unearthed records of her children and traced her presence in various census records. The final piece of the puzzle came when I discovered her listing on Find a Grave, which noted her date of death as 16 October 1903 in Detroit, Michigan.
Jane Doritty’s story had been hidden in the shadows of history, but through persistent research and a stroke of luck, I was able to bring her life back into the light. There is always more to discover, and as I continue to uncover the stories of my ancestors, I am reminded of the importance of perseverance and curiosity in the pursuit of genealogical research.
Stay tuned for more updates as I continue to unravel the intricate tapestry of my family's history. Each new finding is a step closer to understanding the lives of those who came before us.
Monday, February 17, 2025
X00362: Unraveling the Mystery of James Hook: Tracing My 4x Great-Grandfather’s Bankruptcy Records
James Hook, my 4x great-grandfather, led a life filled with notable achievements and a touch of mystery. Born on 20 October 1787 in Belford, Northumberland, England, he passed away on 19 July 1850 in Freetown, Sierra Leone, succumbing to dysentery while serving as a Judge in the Mixed Commission Court. His obituary notes that he was "deeply regretted by all his family and those who knew him." Yet, family lore also suggests another facet to his life: significant financial losses that may have culminated in bankruptcy.
The Known Facts of James Hook’s Life
James lived at 27 Northampton Square, Clerkenwell, Middlesex, during the early 1820s and worked as a merchant in Lambeth, London, by 1841. Later, his career shifted dramatically when, in 1842, he became Her Majesty’s Commissioner of Arbitration in Sierra Leone. By 1850, he was both a Judge of the Mixed Commission Court and a Member of Council for Sierra Leone.
James’s career trajectory, moving from merchant and arbitrator to a high-ranking colonial judge, reflects a man of ambition and adaptability. However, family tradition indicates that James’s earlier years as a merchant might have been fraught with financial difficulties.
Searching for Bankruptcy Records
To substantiate the family narrative, I’ve delved into historical bankruptcy records and uncovered three possible matches for James Hook. Each record represents a chapter of financial distress, yet none can definitively be linked to him without further evidence.
1. 1831 Bankruptcy Record
1833 Bankruptcy Record
1838 Bankruptcy Record
The 1831 and 1838 records are particularly intriguing, as they both list Nicholas Lane, London, as the address. This suggests they may refer to the same James Hook, who was a merchant during this period. However, the 1833 record, which places James in Islington and describes him as an insurance broker, introduces a potential divergence.
Challenges in Confirming the Connection
The primary challenge lies in the lack of documentation tying James Hook to these specific addresses during the 1830s. His documented residences, such as 27 Northampton Square in Clerkenwell during 1819 and 1824, and North Addington Place, Lambeth, in 1841, do not overlap with the locations in the bankruptcy records. Additionally, his transition to Sierra Leone in 1842 leaves a gap in the timeline that further complicates matters.
While the records match James Hook’s profession as a merchant, the absence of corroborating evidence—such as family correspondence, court proceedings, or newspaper reports linking him to these bankruptcies—prevents a definitive connection. It’s also unclear how the financial troubles reflected in these records might have influenced his later decision to accept a position abroad in Sierra Leone.
Next Steps in the Investigation
Potential next research options:
Despite the uncertainties surrounding his financial history, James Hook’s legacy as a colonial judge and his contributions to the suppression of the transatlantic slave trade remain significant. Yet, the possible financial struggles he endured highlight a deeply human aspect of his story. Understanding this chapter of his life may not only provide clarity but also honor his resilience in the face of adversity.
The search continues, and I am optimistic that with persistence, I may one day confirm whether these bankruptcy records belong to my 4x great-grandfather. For now, they serve as tantalizing pieces of a puzzle that remains incomplete.
The Known Facts of James Hook’s Life
James lived at 27 Northampton Square, Clerkenwell, Middlesex, during the early 1820s and worked as a merchant in Lambeth, London, by 1841. Later, his career shifted dramatically when, in 1842, he became Her Majesty’s Commissioner of Arbitration in Sierra Leone. By 1850, he was both a Judge of the Mixed Commission Court and a Member of Council for Sierra Leone.
James’s career trajectory, moving from merchant and arbitrator to a high-ranking colonial judge, reflects a man of ambition and adaptability. However, family tradition indicates that James’s earlier years as a merchant might have been fraught with financial difficulties.
Searching for Bankruptcy Records
To substantiate the family narrative, I’ve delved into historical bankruptcy records and uncovered three possible matches for James Hook. Each record represents a chapter of financial distress, yet none can definitively be linked to him without further evidence.
1. 1831 Bankruptcy Record
- Name: James Hook
- Location: Nicholas Lane, Lombard Street, London
- Occupation: Merchant
- Date: 7 January 1831
1833 Bankruptcy Record
- Name: James Hook
- Location: Cannonbury Square, Islington, Middlesex
- Occupation: Insurance Broker
- Date: 22 November 1833
1838 Bankruptcy Record
- Name: James Hook
- Location: Nicholas Lane, London
- Occupation: General Merchant
The 1831 and 1838 records are particularly intriguing, as they both list Nicholas Lane, London, as the address. This suggests they may refer to the same James Hook, who was a merchant during this period. However, the 1833 record, which places James in Islington and describes him as an insurance broker, introduces a potential divergence.
Challenges in Confirming the Connection
The primary challenge lies in the lack of documentation tying James Hook to these specific addresses during the 1830s. His documented residences, such as 27 Northampton Square in Clerkenwell during 1819 and 1824, and North Addington Place, Lambeth, in 1841, do not overlap with the locations in the bankruptcy records. Additionally, his transition to Sierra Leone in 1842 leaves a gap in the timeline that further complicates matters.
While the records match James Hook’s profession as a merchant, the absence of corroborating evidence—such as family correspondence, court proceedings, or newspaper reports linking him to these bankruptcies—prevents a definitive connection. It’s also unclear how the financial troubles reflected in these records might have influenced his later decision to accept a position abroad in Sierra Leone.
Next Steps in the Investigation
Potential next research options:
- Review Bankruptcy Court Records: Obtain more detailed documentation from the bankruptcy proceedings, which might include addresses, family connections, or additional business affiliations.
- Newspaper Archives: Investigate contemporary newspapers for mentions of James Hook’s financial troubles or bankruptcies, especially in the London area.
- Check additional historical information: Explore directories and tax records from Nicholas Lane and Cannonbury Square during the 1830s to identify any references to James Hook.
Despite the uncertainties surrounding his financial history, James Hook’s legacy as a colonial judge and his contributions to the suppression of the transatlantic slave trade remain significant. Yet, the possible financial struggles he endured highlight a deeply human aspect of his story. Understanding this chapter of his life may not only provide clarity but also honor his resilience in the face of adversity.
The search continues, and I am optimistic that with persistence, I may one day confirm whether these bankruptcy records belong to my 4x great-grandfather. For now, they serve as tantalizing pieces of a puzzle that remains incomplete.
Monday, February 10, 2025
Genealogical Profile: George Forbes (1868–1951)
Genealogical Profile: George Forbes (1868–1951)
Early Life
George Forbes was born on 14 May 1868 in Woolwich, England, to James S. Forbes and Ellen Benson. Little is known about his early childhood, but he immigrated to Canada circa 1880, at the age of 12. This significant move marked the beginning of a life that would span vast distances and diverse occupations.
Religious and Family Life
George was a devoted Roman Catholic, with records of his faith appearing as early as 17 February 1887 in Toronto, York, Ontario, Canada. On 27 February 1897, George married Jane Louisa D’Eye at St. Michael's Cathedral in Toronto. Their union was witnessed by James Forbes and Madeline D’Eye.
Together, George and Jane had three children:
Sadly, Jane passed away on 20 January 1905, leaving George to raise their children.
Career
George’s professional life was as varied as his places of residence. He initially worked as a telegraph dispatcher in Toronto (1897) and later served as a train inspector in Edmonton, Alberta, by 1921. Over the years, George developed a long-standing career with the Canadian Pacific Railway (C.P.R.), working as an employee from 1885 to 1928 and holding roles such as dispatcher and train inspector. By the time of his retirement, his dedication to the railway industry was well-established.
In later years, George shifted careers, working as a fruit grower in Naramata, British Columbia by 1945, a region known for its thriving orchards and vineyards. His residence in Naramata reflects a quieter chapter of his life.
Residences and Travels
George’s life was characterized by frequent relocations. He lived in several Canadian provinces, including Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia. Notable residences included:
George also traveled to Seattle, Washington, USA, on 20 December 1945, perhaps reflecting his ties to family, business, or leisure pursuits.
Later Years and Death
In his later years, George resided in British Columbia, where he lived for 23 years. At the time of his death, he had been living in Vancouver for four months at 1970 McNicoll Street. George Forbes passed away on 13 April 1951 in Vancouver due to chronic myocarditis and generalized arteriosclerosis. He was buried at the Ocean View Burial Parkin Burnaby, British Columbia, on 16 April 1951.
Legacy
George Forbes’s life tells a story of perseverance, faith, and adaptability. From his beginnings in Woolwich to his varied career and family life across Canada, George’s journey exemplifies the experience of many immigrants who contributed to the development of their adopted country. His commitment to family, work, and faith continues to be remembered by those who study his life and lineage.
Early Life
George Forbes was born on 14 May 1868 in Woolwich, England, to James S. Forbes and Ellen Benson. Little is known about his early childhood, but he immigrated to Canada circa 1880, at the age of 12. This significant move marked the beginning of a life that would span vast distances and diverse occupations.
Religious and Family Life
George was a devoted Roman Catholic, with records of his faith appearing as early as 17 February 1887 in Toronto, York, Ontario, Canada. On 27 February 1897, George married Jane Louisa D’Eye at St. Michael's Cathedral in Toronto. Their union was witnessed by James Forbes and Madeline D’Eye.
Together, George and Jane had three children:
- George Edgar Augustine D'Eye Forbes (b. 1898)
- James P. Basil Forbes (b. 1899)
- Gertrude Ellen Forbes (b. 1901)
Sadly, Jane passed away on 20 January 1905, leaving George to raise their children.
Career
George’s professional life was as varied as his places of residence. He initially worked as a telegraph dispatcher in Toronto (1897) and later served as a train inspector in Edmonton, Alberta, by 1921. Over the years, George developed a long-standing career with the Canadian Pacific Railway (C.P.R.), working as an employee from 1885 to 1928 and holding roles such as dispatcher and train inspector. By the time of his retirement, his dedication to the railway industry was well-established.
In later years, George shifted careers, working as a fruit grower in Naramata, British Columbia by 1945, a region known for its thriving orchards and vineyards. His residence in Naramata reflects a quieter chapter of his life.
Residences and Travels
George’s life was characterized by frequent relocations. He lived in several Canadian provinces, including Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia. Notable residences included:
- 20 Ross Street, Toronto (1897)
- Suite 15 Leamington Mansion, Edmonton (1921)
- Naramata, British Columbia (from at least 1945 until his death)
George also traveled to Seattle, Washington, USA, on 20 December 1945, perhaps reflecting his ties to family, business, or leisure pursuits.
Later Years and Death
In his later years, George resided in British Columbia, where he lived for 23 years. At the time of his death, he had been living in Vancouver for four months at 1970 McNicoll Street. George Forbes passed away on 13 April 1951 in Vancouver due to chronic myocarditis and generalized arteriosclerosis. He was buried at the Ocean View Burial Parkin Burnaby, British Columbia, on 16 April 1951.
Legacy
George Forbes’s life tells a story of perseverance, faith, and adaptability. From his beginnings in Woolwich to his varied career and family life across Canada, George’s journey exemplifies the experience of many immigrants who contributed to the development of their adopted country. His commitment to family, work, and faith continues to be remembered by those who study his life and lineage.
Monday, February 3, 2025
Genealogical Profile: Jane Louisa D'Eye (1868-1905)
Genealogical Profile: Jane Louisa D'Eye (1868-1905)
Birth and Baptism Jane Louisa D'Eye was born on 20 March 1868 in Watton, Norfolk, England. She was baptized shortly after, on 24 March 1868, in her hometown [D01885].
Parents and Family Background Jane was the daughter of George Hastings Rust-D'Eye (1836-1885) and Henrietta Fox Addison (1838-1921). Her family’s lineage connects to English roots, with her father’s death in her teenage years marking a significant moment in her early life.
Early Life In 1871, Jane resided at Wick Lane, Watton, Norfolk, England, and was recorded as a scholar in the census. By 1881, she had moved to Market Place, Swaffham, Norfolk, England, where she was attending a ladies' school as a boarder, continuing her education.
Immigration to Canada On 13 May 1883, Jane immigrated to Canada, arriving in Quebec City, Quebec aboard the SS Oregon. This marked the ship’s second voyage with the Dominion Line. The journey began in Liverpool on 3 May 1883, with a stop in Belfast before crossing the Atlantic. The SS Oregon was a notable ship, launched in 1882 with accommodations for over 1,300 passengers, predominantly in third class. Jane's move to Canada was part of a significant wave of British migration during this period [D02319].
Religious Life Jane’s faith journey saw changes over time. Initially recorded as Church of England in the 1891 census while residing in Toronto Junction, York, Ontario, she converted to Roman Catholicism in February 1897, shortly before her marriage.
Marriage and Family Jane married George Forbes on 27 February 1897 at St. Michael's Cathedral, Toronto, York, Ontario [D01887, D07127]. The ceremony was officiated by Father James P. Tracey. The couple had three children:
Health and Death Jane battled phthisis (tuberculosis) and general exhaustion for two years before passing away on 20 January 1905 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada [D07120, D07122]. Her death was reported in the Calgary Herald on 24 January 1905, which noted her lingering illness and the subsequent transport of her remains to Toronto by her husband. She was 36 years old [D07122].
Historical Context and Legacy Jane’s life offers a glimpse into the experiences of young women migrating to Canada during the late 19th century. Her story of resilience, religious conversion, and early death reflects the challenges faced by many settlers during this era. Her descendants, through her three children, carried forward her legacy in Canada.
Conclusion Though Jane’s life was brief, her journey from Norfolk to Canada highlights a narrative of adaptation and endurance. Her story remains a testament to the lives of many women who left their homeland in search of new opportunities and contributed to the fabric of Canadian society.
Sources:
[D01885] (Watton, Norfolk, England), Norfolk, England, Church of England Births and; digital images, ancestry.com
[D01887] Ontario Archives of Ontario, Ontario, Canada Marriages, MS932; Reel: 91: 121, 1368, Forbes-D'Eye; digital images, Ancestry.ca, "Ontario, Canada Marriages".
[D02319] Canada, "Passenger List - SS Oregon 1882"; C-4532 C-4532, Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa.
[D07120] Alberta Provincial Archives of Alberta, Alberta Canada Deaths Index, 1905: 227; digital image, "Alberta Deaths,".
[D07122] "Local and General," Calgary Herald, 24 Jan 1905, p. 8, col. 3; digital images, newspapers.com.
[D07127] (Ontario, Canada), Ontario, Canada, Roman Catholic Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, "Marriage - George Forbes and Jane D'Eye,"; digital images, FamilySearch.org.
Birth and Baptism Jane Louisa D'Eye was born on 20 March 1868 in Watton, Norfolk, England. She was baptized shortly after, on 24 March 1868, in her hometown [D01885].
Parents and Family Background Jane was the daughter of George Hastings Rust-D'Eye (1836-1885) and Henrietta Fox Addison (1838-1921). Her family’s lineage connects to English roots, with her father’s death in her teenage years marking a significant moment in her early life.
Early Life In 1871, Jane resided at Wick Lane, Watton, Norfolk, England, and was recorded as a scholar in the census. By 1881, she had moved to Market Place, Swaffham, Norfolk, England, where she was attending a ladies' school as a boarder, continuing her education.
Immigration to Canada On 13 May 1883, Jane immigrated to Canada, arriving in Quebec City, Quebec aboard the SS Oregon. This marked the ship’s second voyage with the Dominion Line. The journey began in Liverpool on 3 May 1883, with a stop in Belfast before crossing the Atlantic. The SS Oregon was a notable ship, launched in 1882 with accommodations for over 1,300 passengers, predominantly in third class. Jane's move to Canada was part of a significant wave of British migration during this period [D02319].
Religious Life Jane’s faith journey saw changes over time. Initially recorded as Church of England in the 1891 census while residing in Toronto Junction, York, Ontario, she converted to Roman Catholicism in February 1897, shortly before her marriage.
Marriage and Family Jane married George Forbes on 27 February 1897 at St. Michael's Cathedral, Toronto, York, Ontario [D01887, D07127]. The ceremony was officiated by Father James P. Tracey. The couple had three children:
- George Edgar Augustine D'Eye Forbes (b. 1898)
- James P. Basil Forbes (b. 1899)
- Gertrude Ellen Forbes (b. 1901)
Health and Death Jane battled phthisis (tuberculosis) and general exhaustion for two years before passing away on 20 January 1905 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada [D07120, D07122]. Her death was reported in the Calgary Herald on 24 January 1905, which noted her lingering illness and the subsequent transport of her remains to Toronto by her husband. She was 36 years old [D07122].
Historical Context and Legacy Jane’s life offers a glimpse into the experiences of young women migrating to Canada during the late 19th century. Her story of resilience, religious conversion, and early death reflects the challenges faced by many settlers during this era. Her descendants, through her three children, carried forward her legacy in Canada.
Conclusion Though Jane’s life was brief, her journey from Norfolk to Canada highlights a narrative of adaptation and endurance. Her story remains a testament to the lives of many women who left their homeland in search of new opportunities and contributed to the fabric of Canadian society.
Sources:
[D01885] (Watton, Norfolk, England), Norfolk, England, Church of England Births and; digital images, ancestry.com
[D01887] Ontario Archives of Ontario, Ontario, Canada Marriages, MS932; Reel: 91: 121, 1368, Forbes-D'Eye; digital images, Ancestry.ca, "Ontario, Canada Marriages".
[D02319] Canada, "Passenger List - SS Oregon 1882"; C-4532 C-4532, Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa.
[D07120] Alberta Provincial Archives of Alberta, Alberta Canada Deaths Index, 1905: 227; digital image, "Alberta Deaths,".
[D07122] "Local and General," Calgary Herald, 24 Jan 1905, p. 8, col. 3; digital images, newspapers.com.
[D07127] (Ontario, Canada), Ontario, Canada, Roman Catholic Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, "Marriage - George Forbes and Jane D'Eye,"; digital images, FamilySearch.org.
Monday, January 27, 2025
X00277 Unraveling Historical Mysteries: The Case of Ann Doritty
Historical research often uncovers intriguing questions and unexpected connections. One such case involves the confirmation record of Ann Doritty on May 24, 1841. The confirmation record took place at St. Mark’s Church in what is now Niagara-On-The-Lake, Ontario.
At the time of her confirmation, Ann was recorded as being 15 years old, suggesting a birth year of either 1826 or 1827.
The location of Niagara-On-The-Lake and the timing does fit with my Dorrity family. And I’m not aware of any other Dorrity families in the area around that time. But I don’t have any records of an Ann Dorrity born in those years. Thomas and Ann Doritty were marred later in 1831.
A question arises: Could this confirmation actually pertain to Henriette Elizabeth Mundy instead? She would have been born 16 December 1827, which is close to the time. Since her mother remarried, she could have been going under the surname of Dorrity. It’s a long shot, but it's worth exploring if the confirmation meant for Ann Doritty might have been hers. The details align closely, raising the possibility of a clerical error or a mistaken identity over time.
Investigating further into church and community records from that period, as well as cross-referencing family histories, could shed more light on this mystery. There are other possibilities as well – perhaps Thomas Doritty had a sibling or other relative who also lived in Niagara at the time.
This case highlights the complexities and the detective-like work often involved in historical research. Each piece of information adds depth to our understanding of the past, helping us to build a more accurate and rich tapestry of history.
At the time of her confirmation, Ann was recorded as being 15 years old, suggesting a birth year of either 1826 or 1827.
The location of Niagara-On-The-Lake and the timing does fit with my Dorrity family. And I’m not aware of any other Dorrity families in the area around that time. But I don’t have any records of an Ann Dorrity born in those years. Thomas and Ann Doritty were marred later in 1831.
A question arises: Could this confirmation actually pertain to Henriette Elizabeth Mundy instead? She would have been born 16 December 1827, which is close to the time. Since her mother remarried, she could have been going under the surname of Dorrity. It’s a long shot, but it's worth exploring if the confirmation meant for Ann Doritty might have been hers. The details align closely, raising the possibility of a clerical error or a mistaken identity over time.
Investigating further into church and community records from that period, as well as cross-referencing family histories, could shed more light on this mystery. There are other possibilities as well – perhaps Thomas Doritty had a sibling or other relative who also lived in Niagara at the time.
This case highlights the complexities and the detective-like work often involved in historical research. Each piece of information adds depth to our understanding of the past, helping us to build a more accurate and rich tapestry of history.
Monday, January 20, 2025
X00057 Peter Brown and Annie Paton Kerr Missing Child - Solved!
The 1911 census for Peter Brown and Annie Paton Kerr, mentions that the couple had twelve children, but only nine were alive at the time of the 1911 census.
Through thorough research, I identified eleven of their children from previous census records:
From this list, we can see that both the first Peter Brown and Annie Kerr Brown had passed away prior to the 1911 census. This leaves a gap—there must have been one more child, born and died between census years, never appearing in any of the census records.
To fill in this missing piece, I turned to other genealogical resources. While searching through Ancestry, I stumbled upon references to a Jennie Kerr Brown. This led me to Scotland’s People, where I discovered a birth record for Jeannie Kerr Brown, born 16 April 1878, and a death record dated 28 March 1880. As suspected, Jeannie Kerr Brown was born and passed away between the census years, thus explaining why she wasn’t recorded in the census records.
This discovery, while fulfilling in terms of completing the family tree, also brought a poignant reminder of the challenges and sorrows faced by our ancestors. The short life of Jeannie Kerr Brown, and the losses endured by Peter and Annie Brown, are now acknowledged and remembered, adding depth and context to the Brown family history.
Sources:
[D00338] 1911 census of Scotland, Larbert, Stirlingshire, Scotland, enumeration district (ED) 2, page 8, schedule no. 57; digital images, ScotlandsPeople.
Through thorough research, I identified eleven of their children from previous census records:
- Maria Kerr Brown, b. 1875
- Peter Brown, b. 1876, d. 1884
- William K. Brown, b. 1879
- James Brown, b. 1881
- John Young Brown, b. 1883
- Jane Menzies Brown, b. 1885
- Peter Brown, b. 1887
- Annie Kerr Brown, b. 1889, d. 1909
- Elizabeth Brown, b. 1894
- Thomas Kerr Brown, b. 1896
- Alexander Brown, b. 1889
From this list, we can see that both the first Peter Brown and Annie Kerr Brown had passed away prior to the 1911 census. This leaves a gap—there must have been one more child, born and died between census years, never appearing in any of the census records.
To fill in this missing piece, I turned to other genealogical resources. While searching through Ancestry, I stumbled upon references to a Jennie Kerr Brown. This led me to Scotland’s People, where I discovered a birth record for Jeannie Kerr Brown, born 16 April 1878, and a death record dated 28 March 1880. As suspected, Jeannie Kerr Brown was born and passed away between the census years, thus explaining why she wasn’t recorded in the census records.
This discovery, while fulfilling in terms of completing the family tree, also brought a poignant reminder of the challenges and sorrows faced by our ancestors. The short life of Jeannie Kerr Brown, and the losses endured by Peter and Annie Brown, are now acknowledged and remembered, adding depth and context to the Brown family history.
Sources:
[D00338] 1911 census of Scotland, Larbert, Stirlingshire, Scotland, enumeration district (ED) 2, page 8, schedule no. 57; digital images, ScotlandsPeople.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)